Daniel Amos Message Board (http://www.danielamos.com/wbb2/index.php)
- DA Related Discussion (http://www.danielamos.com/wbb2/board.php?boardid=4)
-- General Discussion (http://www.danielamos.com/wbb2/board.php?boardid=1)
--- Darn Floor Big Curiosity (http://www.danielamos.com/wbb2/thread.php?threadid=11327)


Posted by Mountain Fan on 12-20-2006 at15:11:

 

DFBB was a great album because ...











































they did not try to sound like the Beatles! Tongue Big Grin



Posted by Lur King on 12-20-2006 at15:43:

 




Posted by servantsteve on 12-20-2006 at16:31:

 

quote:
Originally posted by Lur King
Every song in that book is written for the mandolin.



Posted by Scrimshaw Nick on 12-20-2006 at17:43:

 

mandolins suck! Mad




Sorry, I thought I was joey for a minute. Tongue
_______________
Mandolins make me happy on the Message Boards Happy



Posted by Josh&etc on 12-21-2006 at09:12:

 

quote:
Originally posted by jiminy

I found a real fun site for those who dig DFFB-
are you ready?????
(hang on to your collective hats here.....sheesh!)

http://www.av1611.org/cqguide.html


Roll Eyes
I just have one question: Does this site have anything to do with the Right Reverend Dr. Edward Daniel Taylor?


Seriously, my eyes hurt from all the red letters (not to mention the high velocity scrolling Big Grin )



Posted by SnowMan on 12-21-2006 at09:22:

 

In the early days of AAR, somebody from the forums here was exceptionally kind and sent me (anonymously) DFBB on vinyl, unopened. What an incredible gift. Still, I didn't have a copy of the album which I could listen to because there was NO WAY I was opening the LP.

Well, somebody else from this community sent me an extra original CD copy of DFBB, so the LP traveled all the way to C-Stone with me and...

In an earlier conversation, Terry had mentioned to me that he himself had no copy of DFBB. So, I passed the LP on to Terry. I hope whomever sent me that LP is happy with where it ended up and not offended that I passed it along.

But there's the stinkin' irony: the originator of the tunes did not himself own a copy of DFBB. That was just wrong. Wink



Posted by joey on 12-21-2006 at10:59:

 

quote:
Originally posted by SnowMan

But there's the stinkin' irony: the originator of the tunes did not himself own a copy of DFBB. That was just wrong. Wink


or the rights to reprint it....... Frown
hi theo! Big Grin



Posted by jiminy on 12-21-2006 at14:35:

 

quote:
Originally posted by joey
quote:
Originally posted by SnowMan

But there's the stinkin' irony: the originator of the tunes did not himself own a copy of DFBB. That was just wrong. Wink


or the rights to reprint it....... Frown
hi theo! Big Grin


its prolly not even floating around in his head anymore even........
pushed out by that dang Catscratch theme...!



Posted by joey on 12-21-2006 at15:07:

Frown

quote:
Originally posted by jiminy
quote:
Originally posted by joey
quote:
Originally posted by SnowMan

But there's the stinkin' irony: the originator of the tunes did not himself own a copy of DFBB. That was just wrong. Wink


or the rights to reprint it....... Frown
hi theo! Big Grin


its prolly not even floating around in his head anymore even........
pushed out by that dang Catscratch theme...!


Crying



Posted by dennis on 12-21-2006 at16:00:

 

quote:
Originally posted by joey
quote:
Originally posted by jiminy
quote:
Originally posted by joey
quote:
Originally posted by SnowMan

But there's the stinkin' irony: the originator of the tunes did not himself own a copy of DFBB. That was just wrong. Wink


or the rights to reprint it....... Frown
hi theo! Big Grin


its prolly not even floating around in his head anymore even........
pushed out by that dang Catscratch theme...!


Crying


Tongue LOL! Tongue



Posted by Mountain Fan on 01-02-2007 at11:48:

 

quote:
Originally posted by SnowMan
In the early days of AAR, somebody from the forums here was exceptionally kind and sent me (anonymously) DFBB on vinyl, unopened. What an incredible gift. Still, I didn't have a copy of the album which I could listen to because there was NO WAY I was opening the LP.

Well, somebody else from this community sent me an extra original CD copy of DFBB, so the LP traveled all the way to C-Stone with me and...

In an earlier conversation, Terry had mentioned to me that he himself had no copy of DFBB. So, I passed the LP on to Terry. I hope whomever sent me that LP is happy with where it ended up and not offended that I passed it along.

But there's the stinkin' irony: the originator of the tunes did not himself own a copy of DFBB. That was just wrong. Wink


That was not "just wrong" - actually, that BITES BIG! Tongue Big Grin



Posted by Shadow-Master713 on 01-04-2007 at17:50:

 

quote:
Originally posted by jiminy

I found a real fun site for those who dig DFFB-
are you ready?????
(hang on to your collective hats here.....sheesh!)

http://www.av1611.org/cqguide.html


Wow, that just......wow......

"The purpose of Christian music was NEVER meant to evangelize the lost!"

I can't put into words how ridiculous that sounds.


Back on topic, the only copy of DFBB I've ever had is on cassette. I need to go back and give it a listen since I haven't heard it since I was in middle school.



Posted by jeffrey k. on 01-04-2007 at18:58:

 

quote:
Originally posted by jiminy

I found a real fun site for those who dig DFFB-
are you ready?????
(hang on to your collective hats here.....sheesh!)

http://www.av1611.org/cqguide.html


Here is a line from that website makes me laugh:

"Let's listen to the "screaming-satanic-man-worship" in a few CCM concerts..."

fantastic...

jeffrey k.



Posted by MarkyMark77 on 01-05-2007 at09:22:

 

quote:
screaming-satanic-man-worship


The next DA album title, perhaps?



Posted by oomarty7 on 01-05-2007 at18:46:

 

Here is a line from that website makes me laugh:

"Let's listen to the "screaming-satanic-man-worship" in a few CCM concerts..."

fantastic...



I think that website might have a point though, I feel a little bad listening to "screaming-satanic-man-worship." Maybe if it was toned down a little to "wailing-demonic-man-accolades" I would feel more comfortable with it. Just a thought.



Posted by jeffrey k. on 01-06-2007 at08:57:

 

quote:
Originally posted by oomarty7
I think that website might have a point though, I feel a little bad listening to "screaming-satanic-man-worship." Maybe if it was toned down a little to "wailing-demonic-man-accolades" I would feel more comfortable with it. Just a thought.


Are you being serious? Do you really think they have a point?

jeffrey k.



Posted by Eis on 01-06-2007 at10:31:

 

Sure they do...it's just invalid. Tongue



Posted by DwDunphy on 01-06-2007 at10:45:

 

In fact, I partly agree with the statement that Christian Rock (ew) is not meant to evangelize, at least not in the traditional sense, If anything, the best of the stuff coaxes the listener into making their own decisions, not beating them over the head with the Gideon, then scorching their feet with hellfire.

The best Christian music tries to show God through different lenses. After all, there are many out there who would be saved if only they thought God still existed, period. The athiestic nihlism that is part & parcel of the modern culture doesn't even have room for the thought. Sometimes, all it takes is someone to say, "that amazing thing you're seeing can't be an accident".

It's also good for the practicing Christian to hear, now and again, that God does not talk in everyone's ear or make them speak in tongues or give them faith-healing gifts. God has not forsaken you just because you live an average life - actually, your averageness might be His greatest blessing to you, depending on how you look at it.

So I agree in part that the best CCM doesn't beat the listener into spiritual submission, but kind of points them to the door. As for the 'screaming man worship', the writer will just have to reconcile that his own darn self.

DwD



Posted by Eis on 01-06-2007 at14:11:

 

yeah, except what they are saying by "not meant to evangelize" is that the only proper use of music is praising God, as defined by them.



Posted by jiminy on 01-07-2007 at08:22:

 

quote:
Originally posted by Eis
yeah, except what they are saying by "not meant to evangelize" is that the only proper use of music is praising God, as defined by them.


I know certain folk who attest to that - that music is Gods creation ONLY- well - and that everything in life is for praising God ONLY..

honestly - I was in a discussion about that and said- "Oops excuse me- I passd gas..was THAT for Gods Glory??

really!... I hope it had vibrato and intonation.......


Forum Software: Burning Board 2.3.6, Developed by WoltLab GmbH